Oh we with the pitchforks. . .

rapeLast week I wrote an article titled Rape Culture. In it I said that Brock Turner was a “former Stanford student and US Olympic Swim Team hopeful convicted of 3 counts of felony rape. . .”

I was wrong.

Brock Turner wasn’t convicted of rape.

He was found guilty of three things:

  1. Assault with INTENT to commit rape
  2. Penetration with a foreign object of an intoxicated woman.
  3. Penetration with a foreign object of an unconscious woman.

The police arrested Brock Turner on suspicion of attempted rape immediately after the rape based on the statements of the two cyclists and the victim’s inability to make a statement. However, Brock Turner was dressed and there did not appear to be any overt evidence of intercourse at the scene.

Intent to commit rape, legally, is not the same as having sexual intercourse with a person, and therefore, Turner is not a convicted rapist.

But he is now a registered sex offender for the rest of his life.

I’m saying this because many people, myself included, have called Brock Turner a rapist.

There is a difference between intent to rape and rape.  Just like there’s a difference between intent to commit murder and murder.

Thank God for those two Swedes on bicycles who stopped him.

Maybe, finding out that he received a 6 month jail sentence, in light of this information, would help people understand the judge’s decision to not put Brock Turner in prison for years.

I’ve tried to post this information on social media.

My comments have been deleted.

No one wants to hear about the legalities of the case.

All they care about is that Brock Turner is being called the Stanford Rapist therefore he MUST BE a rapist.

Because if it’s written online, it must be true.

Well, like it or not, it’s not true.

Brock is guilty of several things, but actually raping the victim in the Stanford “Rape” case is not one of them.

Comments are open if you want to share your thoughts.

One thought on “Oh we with the pitchforks. . .

  1. My issue personally with the sentencing is that the Judge had to deem that there were special mitigating circumstances to hand down that sentence. The otherwise prescribed minimum sentence would have been 2 yrs in prison with a potential of up to 14 yrs. To date Brock has yet to acknowledge that he did anything else wrong that night except have too much to drink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s